The FTC just took legal action against a top MLM earner for deceptive income claims — and the income disclosures showed that 76.8% of active participants earned zero compensation. If you’ve ever been told a luxury lifestyle is what’s waiting for you on the other side of network marketing, this one’s for you. No rose-colored glasses. Just the truth.
There’s a good chance I’m going to get fired up in this one. Fair warning.
It started with an Instagram reel. A top-earning MLM influencer, boarding a chartered plane in Christian Louboutins, taking a not-so-subtle jab at women doing UGC, Amazon Influencer content, and affiliate marketing. The implication? Do MLM instead. This could be you.
And then the FTC went and made it official — taking legal action against a high-level MLM participant for deceptive income claims and misleading lifestyle marketing. So let’s talk about it. All of it.
Because I am not coming at this as someone who never made it. I spent over a decade in network marketing, specifically Beachbody — the Artist Formerly Known as Beachbody. I was in the top 0.01%. In Beachbody, that was called Legacy Club, and it meant you had accrued over a million dollars in commissions.
I had multiple business centers and earned multiple seven figures. So when I say the lifestyle being marketed is wildly disconnected from the statistical reality, I’m saying it from the inside.
The FTC Case — What Actually Happened
In 2026, the FTC took action against a high-level MLM participant — not the company, the actual influencer — for deceptive income claims and misleading lifestyle marketing tied to recruitment. She had allegedly promised recruits “no less than six figures” and pledged to make 60 new millionaires in a single year.
Here’s what the income disclosures actually showed:
- 76.8% of active participants in one of her companies earned zero compensation in 2023
- At most 0.4% earned more than $5,000
- In the other company, fewer than 1% earned six figures
She is now legally prohibited from making deceptive earnings claims — ever.
But here’s what matters most: this is not a one-bad-actor story. The FTC has reviewed 70 MLM income disclosures and found this same pattern across the board.
“Showing the top 0.1% without talking about the other 99.9% is marketing. It is not transparency.”
The Real Math Nobody’s Talking About
Let me give you the actual numbers, because I think most people genuinely don’t know how stark they are.
Based on FTC analysis and industry data:
- 73–99% of MLM participants either lose money or earn very little
- Only the top 1–5% earn what most people would consider substantial income
- Earning $100,000 or more? We’re talking roughly 0.05% of participants
- Earning a solid $60,000/year after expenses? Probably below 1% overall — and that’s before subtracting costs
The Expenses Nobody Mentions
MLM companies advertise gross commissions, not actual take-home. Someone can “earn” $60,000 in commissions and still lose money once you subtract:
- Required product purchases and monthly minimums
- Conference travel and team events
- Content creation and advertising costs
- Unsold inventory sitting in your garage
- Taxes on gross — not net — commissions
The FTC specifically called out that most income disclosures don’t account for any of these expenses. So the already-depressing numbers are actually worse than they appear.
Why I Made It — And Why That Doesn’t Mean You Will
This is the part I have to be honest about, because I think it matters.
When I ended up in the top 0.01% of network marketing, was that because of the MLM itself? Or was it because I already came in with the personality traits, competitiveness, leadership ability, and discipline to make it work?
I was class president of my high school class. Captain of my golf team. Voted most likely to succeed. I became a Division 1 golf coach — the youngest head coach in the country at 22 years and one month. I’m a PGA professional. I’m a professional athlete.
That grit, those communication skills, that drive — it would have likely made me successful in almost anything. It wasn’t the vehicle of network marketing. Heck, I could have been slinging shampoo somewhere else and probably done just fine.
And when I look at the people who rise to the very top of MLM, it’s almost always one of two types:
- Naturally high performers — athletes, entrepreneurs, leaders who already knew how to sell, influence, and motivate before they ever signed up
- People whose backs were completely against the wall — those for whom failure simply wasn’t an option, and they found a way to make it work out of sheer necessity
Neither of those stories represents the average person who just wants to make some extra income from their phone while staying home with their kids.
“Exceptional people often succeed in multiple business models. The problem starts when exceptional people are used as evidence that exceptional outcomes are normal — because they’re not.”
The Private Jet Isn’t the Problem — The Implication Is
I want to be clear: I am not a hater when it comes to nice things. Louis Vuitton, Rolex, Jimmy Choo — in my previous life, I was right there with you. I get it.
What I’m disgusted with is the lifestyle being presented as attainable through this specific vehicle, when the math simply doesn’t support it.
Private charter flights for a three-hour trip? Easily $20,000–$35,000. I know this because my members charter flights regularly — I have students who own their own jets. Christian Louboutins run $800 to $1,500 a pair. Walking onto a chartered plane and implying network marketing is what paid for it? That’s not transparent. That’s a funnel.
What the Fine Print Actually Said
When I dug into this particular influencer’s profile, I found she had quietly added context in her highlights — basically covering her bases. She was already a seven-figure business owner before she ever joined network marketing. She had Airbnb properties generating seven figures. She was a business coach generating seven figures. Multiple revenue streams, multiple businesses, and an already-built audience.
That changes the context entirely.
You’re not watching a regular person succeed through an MLM. You’re watching a serial entrepreneur who already understood branding, sales, leadership, and audience-building use network marketing as one piece of a much larger ecosystem. That is an outlier. And there is nothing wrong with being successful — genuinely, kudos to her for building what she has.
But a serial entrepreneur succeeding in network marketing does not prove that network marketing works for the average person. Full stop.
It’s like watching an Olympic athlete succeed in a new sport and using that as evidence that the sport is what made them great. No — they were already fit, disciplined, and trained. The vehicle wasn’t the reason.
Find Your UGC Niche & Start Creating With Confidence
Use code “STOPWAITING” to get it FREE!
UGC, Amazon, and the Income Path That Actually Makes Sense for Most People
Now let’s talk about what this influencer was actually mocking: women doing UGC, Amazon Influencer content, and affiliate marketing.
In UGC, you can earn $200 for a single brand deal — with no downline, no team, no monthly minimums, and no recruiting your friends and family. You get paid up front, or you create a digital product you own that sells repeatedly.
To earn that same $200 in a network marketing company, you’d need to sell to three or four people — with no guarantee the sale goes through, and the decision ultimately not being yours.
You Build Assets You Own
Here’s what I see so clearly now that I’m in the world of UGC, Amazon Influencer, digital products, and content creation:
When you do this work, you’re building communication skills, marketing skills, editing skills, sales skills. You’re building audience trust. And these are assets you own.
With MLM, yes — you learn to edit reels and create content. But you’re not getting paid for that directly. You have to hope someone clicks your link. You have to hope someone buys. You have to hope someone joins your team. You’re not building equity. You’re building someone else’s compensation plan.
One of my students — a former Beachbody coach — had her colon removed and created a detailed guide for people about to go through the same experience. She took her pain, turned it into a digital product she owns, and now helps others while generating income from it. That is skill-based income. That is yours.
“There’s a difference between this is possible and this is probable. And that distinction matters a lot, especially to the FTC.”
What To Do With This Information
Let’s get real for a second — because I want you to walk away from this with something you can actually do, not just something to feel frustrated about.
If you’re currently in an MLM or considering joining one, the very first thing I’d ask you to do is find the income disclosure statement. Not the testimonials page. Not the top earner spotlight.
The actual disclosure — and read the percentages. That document exists specifically to show you the statistical reality of what most participants earn. Use it.
Next, ask yourself one honest question: is this business model dependent on recruiting? Because if the answer is yes, your income isn’t tied to how hard you work or how great the product is. It’s tied to whether you can convince other people to do the same thing you’re doing.
That is a fundamentally different kind of work — and the math on it is what the FTC has now made abundantly clear.
If you’ve been in MLM and it didn’t work, I want you to hear me: it’s not you. The model is structured so that a very small number of people succeed at the top while the majority do the work that makes it possible. That’s not motivation — that’s math.
For those of you looking for a path that creates multiple streams of income on your own terms, I’d genuinely encourage you to look at UGC, Amazon Influencer, affiliate marketing, digital products, or content creation. These are skill-based income models.
You build something you own. And in a world where we have tools like Claude available to help you create and launch faster than ever, there has never been a better time to start.
Action Steps:
- Identify one skill you already have and ask: how could I turn this into income I own?
- Find the income disclosure statement for any MLM before you sign up — read the real numbers
- Ask: does this require recruiting? If yes, understand exactly what that means for your income ceiling
- Research UGC and Amazon Influencer as starter income models that pay you without a downline
The Bottom Line
A luxury lifestyle is not proof that an opportunity works for the average person.
If a business model only looks incredible at the top 0.1%, that’s not financial freedom for most people — that’s a funnel.
The FTC case isn’t just about one influencer. It’s a documented, legal confirmation of something a lot of us already knew: the math has never lied, and the lifestyle marketing has never been transparent.
You deserve to make informed decisions about your income. And there are real, legitimate ways to earn online that don’t require you to recruit your friends and family, hit monthly minimums, or hope your downline shows up.
I believe we’re each guided toward the income and life we’re meant to build — in accordance with His will, not someone else’s funnel. And part of that is making sure you have the real information to make the best choices for yourself and your family.
Want to hear the full conversation? Tune into Episode 130 of the If You Know You Know podcast.
Ready to build income you actually own? If UGC sounds like the path for you, check out my UGC course and start building skills that pay you directly — no downline required.
